Sun. Sep 7th, 2025

2025 NBA Mock Draft: Post-Combine Projections

With the 2025 NBA Draft Combine now concluded, featuring comprehensive measurements, athletic evaluations, drills, and scrimmage games, the focus shifts to insights from league personnel regarding the top prospects and the impact of their performances in Chicago on their draft stock.

Key questions emerge, such as whether the Dallas Mavericks will indeed make the anticipated selection of Cooper Flagg as the top pick. The Brooklyn Nets, holding four first-round selections, face choices regarding the best fits for their roster. Similarly, the Philadelphia 76ers at pick No. 3 must decide among a diverse group of potential prospects like Ace Bailey, VJ Edgecombe, Tre Johnson, Khaman Maluach, and Kon Knueppel.

Several international talents, such as Joan Beringer and Noa Essengue, were unable to participate in the recent combine due to ongoing club commitments. They are expected to attend an NBA-organized combine in Treviso, Italy, in early June. Additionally, NBA teams will conduct private workouts to refine their draft boards and make final decisions ahead of the draft ceremony in Brooklyn, scheduled to commence on June 25th.

This post-combine mock draft offers a comprehensive assessment of the 2025 class, incorporating insights gathered from scouts and team front offices. Note that the New York Knicks` second-round pick was forfeited following an NBA investigation into Jalen Brunson`s 2022 free agency signing.

First Round

Dallas Mavericks logo Pick 1: Dallas Mavericks

Cooper Flagg, SF/PF, Duke | Freshman | TS%: 60.0

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-7¾
  • Weight: 221 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-10½
  • Wingspan: 7-0

Intel and fit: In a fortunate turn of events, the Mavericks received unexpected luck in the lottery, enabling their fanbase to move past the Luka Doncic trade era and anticipate adding Cooper Flagg, considered a future star of the NBA. ESPN`s Tim MacMahon reported shortly after the draft lottery that Mavericks ownership intends to keep the pick and select Flagg at No. 1, as widely expected. Reports from Flagg`s camp suggest he is excited about potentially joining a playoff-contending team with strong veteran presence, despite his initial surprise at the lottery results. Sources indicate Flagg is planning a visit to Dallas. Flagg`s spectacular freshman year at Duke dispelled any doubts about his status as the likely No. 1 pick. As only the fourth freshman to win the Wooden Award, Flagg demonstrated exceptional competitiveness and defensive versatility, influencing every aspect of the game. He consistently hit jumpers, handled significant shot-creation duties, and improved his teammates through his passing. The main question among scouts is whether Flagg will become `merely` an NBA All-Star or, as some believe, evolve into one of the league`s most impactful players on both ends of the court.


San Antonio Spurs logo Pick 2: San Antonio Spurs

Dylan Harper, PG/SG, Rutgers | Freshman | TS%: 59.3

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-4½
  • Weight: 213 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-6
  • Wingspan: 6-10½

Intel and fit: Already in a strong long-term position, the Spurs again saw lottery luck, moving up six spots to No. 2 and gaining the opportunity to select Harper, who is widely considered the top prospect available after Flagg. San Antonio was reportedly thrilled with their lottery fortune, and early indications suggest they are comfortable selecting Harper, prioritizing the best talent available over potential fit concerns in a backcourt that includes De`Aaron Fox and Rookie of the Year Stephon Castle. Building a foundation around Victor Wembanyama (21), Castle (20), and Harper (19) on rookie deals provides significant salary cap flexibility in the short term. While this pick might raise questions about the Spurs` shooting and guard ballhandling distribution, Harper`s considerable talent makes the selection easily justifiable. Although trade speculation has surrounded San Antonio`s pick since the lottery, at this point, it appears to be mostly talk. The Spurs aim to reach the playoffs with Wembanyama but are not necessarily pressured to make a blockbuster deal immediately, whether for Giannis Antetokounmpo (if available) or another star. San Antonio possesses the future draft assets to keep Harper and still significantly enhance their roster at a lower cost. Rival teams anticipate the Spurs will explore their options, but the general assumption is that Harper will be the pick unless a major trade occurs.


Philadelphia 76ers logo Pick 3: Philadelphia 76ers

Airious `Ace` Bailey, SG/SF, Rutgers | Freshman | TS%: 54.0

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-7½
  • Weight: 202 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-11
  • Wingspan: 7-0½

Intel and fit: This pick introduces significant intrigue to the draft, as the 76ers are reportedly considering a broad range of prospects, including Bailey, VJ Edgecombe, Tre Johnson, Khaman Maluach, and Kon Knueppel. Bailey, widely regarded as the third-most talented player in this draft class, presents a natural fit, capable of easily slotting into the Sixers` lineup at shooting guard, small forward, or power forward, complementing any of their current players. Feedback from Chicago suggests Bailey is somewhat polarizing among front offices, with questions raised about his feel for the game and his “unpolished” team interviews. One NBA general manager compared his pre-draft interview process to that of Anthony Edwards (No. 1 pick in 2020). While Bailey may not have appeared as “buttoned up” as some peers, he received positive reviews from some executives who valued his honesty and willingness to show his personality. Some teams expect the Sixers to be active in trade discussions, with names like Kevin Durant (Phoenix) and Lauri Markkanen (Utah) potentially being targets in deals that could involve Paul George and the No. 3 pick. Sixers president Daryl Morey is known for being active and aggressive in the trade market, but trading a top-three pick is historically uncommon. Adding a young, talented prospect could be appealing for resetting the team`s timeline and offering long-term hope, considering Joel Embiid`s injury history and George`s significant contract, which may not age favorably.


Charlotte Hornets logo Pick 4: Charlotte Hornets

VJ Edgecombe, SG, Baylor | Freshman | TS%: 56.1

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-4
  • Weight: 193 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-5½
  • Wingspan: 6-7½

Intel and fit: Although dropping one spot was a minor disappointment, the Hornets were the only team with top-four lottery odds to remain in that range. The No. 4 pick remains valuable, ensuring either Edgecombe or Bailey will be available, both representing significant talent upgrades. Edgecombe is generally seen as the safer choice for Charlotte between the two, but there`s no clear consensus among teams after the first two picks, making this part of the draft unpredictable. Given the Hornets` needs, Tre Johnson could also be considered here. On paper, Edgecombe is a natural fit, fitting between LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller. His explosive downhill drives, slashing ability, and considerable defensive potential complement Ball`s vision and Miller`s shooting. He also has potential to develop into a larger ballhandling role, which could make him more attractive as a long-term backcourt option. The Hornets took a patient approach at the trade deadline, and other teams are curious about their urgency this offseason, having sold assets at the deadline but also missing the playoffs for nine consecutive seasons.


Utah Jazz logo Pick 5: Utah Jazz

Jeremiah Fears, PG, Oklahoma | Freshman | TS%: 57.0

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-2½
  • Weight: 179 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-2½
  • Wingspan: 6-5¼

Intel and fit: Dropping from a projected No. 1 slot before the lottery to the No. 5 pick was a setback for the Jazz`s fanbase and front office, raising questions about the team`s timeline and the value of enduring another difficult season potentially targeting a top pick in 2026. With the roster in significant need of star talent, it makes sense to seriously consider a prospect like Fears, who had an impressive season at Oklahoma despite being one of the youngest players in college basketball at 18. His blend of size, speed, pace, scoring ability, and shot creation gives him considerable long-term potential. He can effectively penetrate to create for others, finish skillfully near the basket, or draw fouls. Drafting Fears would likely impact the roster, as the Jazz have drafted point guards in the last two years (Keyonte George and Isaiah Collier). The biggest questions revolve around the future of Lauri Markkanen, a two-time All-Star who would attract significant interest if the Jazz were open to trading him. Falling from the league`s worst record (17-65) to the No. 5 pick is a stark reminder of rebuilding challenges, but how else the Jazz can take the necessary steps toward building a championship contender remains unclear.


Washington Wizards logo Pick 6: Washington Wizards

Tre Johnson, SG, Texas | Freshman | TS%: 56.1

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-4¾
  • Weight: 190 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-5
  • Wingspan: 6-10¼

Intel and fit: The Wizards find themselves in a situation similar to the Jazz after dropping four slots in a unfavorable lottery outcome, though they are in an earlier phase of their complete rebuild. Washington continues its search for star talent through the draft and will likely take a chance on whichever high-potential player is available outside the top five. In this scenario, it`s Johnson, who would address an immediate need and offers the upside to develop as their long-term shooting guard. He is considered one of the draft`s top perimeter shooters, possesses solid positional size, and plays with an aggressive approach, having benefited from a significant role at Texas. Johnson has been another polarizing prospect among teams due to questions about his playing style, which scouts have occasionally described as selfish as he progressed through high school and college. These concerns persisted after the interview process in Chicago – specifically regarding his shot selection and long-term adaptability to varied roles – though few players in the class possess his level of scoring talent. The Wizards can provide him with an immediate offensive role and commit to his development, making them a potentially favorable fit for Johnson within the top 10.


New Orleans Pelicans logo Pick 7: New Orleans Pelicans

Khaman Maluach, C, Duke | Freshman | TS%: 74.7

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 7-0¾
  • Weight: 252 lbs
  • Standing reach: 9-6
  • Wingspan: 7-6¾

Intel and fit: Another team that experienced a significant drop after a difficult season. The Pelicans hold only the No. 7 pick after finishing with a 21-61 record, a challenging start for new lead executives Joe Dumars and Troy Weaver. The Pelicans are in significant need of star power, but with top prospects like Bailey and Fears projected to be selected earlier, choosing a high-upside big man such as Maluach makes sense. Maluach is among the youngest prospects in the draft, turning 19 on September 14th, and has considerable potential for physical and skill development. He plays with tremendous intensity and is highly regarded by coaches and teammates for his exceptional off-court character. His ability to anchor a defense with his length, provide vertical spacing as a screener and cutter, and aggressively run in transition will be attractive to any team seeking a long-term center, including potentially the Hornets or Wizards picking at No. 4 and No. 6.


Brooklyn Nets logo Pick 8: Brooklyn Nets

Kon Knueppel, SG/SF, Duke | Freshman | TS%: 64.8

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-5
  • Weight: 219 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-5½
  • Wingspan: 6-6¼

Intel and fit: The Nets are among the teams disappointed by the lottery results, dropping two spots from No. 6 to No. 8 after San Antonio and Dallas moved up. Brooklyn has veteran players like Cameron Johnson, four first-round picks in this draft, and future assets they could use to trade up in the lottery. Teams anticipate the Nets, who are also managing their present and future cap space, will consolidate some of their assets. Knueppel`s consistent offensive game and high-level shooting would be a solid foundation for the Nets, with his skillset complementing most lineups regardless of their long-term building strategy. League insiders also see potential for additional scoring and playmaking from the versatile wing. There`s also an interesting argument for drafting and developing a young ball handler like Egor Demin or Kasparas Jakucionis, or pursuing the offensive potential of Derik Queen, should the Nets retain this pick.


Toronto Raptors logo Pick 9: Toronto Raptors

Collin Murray-Boyles, PF/C, South Carolina | Sophomore | TS%: 64.0

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-6½
  • Weight: 239 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-10
  • Wingspan: 7-0¾

Intel and fit: The Raptors have several potential directions with this pick, given the abundance of young, versatile players already on their roster, acquired through recent drafts and trades. Murray-Boyles aligns with the team`s emphasis on culture and toughness, adding defensive versatility and playmaking, although his lack of perimeter shooting might not be ideal for floor spacing alongside Scottie Barnes and Brandon Ingram. Picking ninth in a draft class where many insiders view the top tier as eight players, a best-player-available strategy makes sense for Toronto, consistent with this front office`s past approach. Murray-Boyles` unique combination of passing, drawing fouls, finishing skill, and defensive instincts places him as a potential top-5 prospect in some NBA team analytics models, particularly notable since he doesn`t turn 20 until mid-June.


Houston Rockets logo Pick 10: Houston Rockets (via Phoenix)

Kasparas Jakucionis, PG, Illinois | Freshman | TS%: 59.8

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-4¾
  • Weight: 205 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-3½
  • Wingspan: 6-7¾

Intel and fit: This pick is widely seen as a valuable asset for the Rockets, who are frequently mentioned by other teams as potential major trade players building on their recent season`s success. Houston possesses the draft capital and young talent to target whichever star player might become available next, in addition to Reed Sheppard, who is likely anticipating more playing time next season. If Houston retains the pick, it`s likely a best-available scenario, and Jakucionis presents a strong case at No. 10. His playmaking vision, shooting ability, and intangible qualities, combined with excellent positional size for a guard (comparable measurements to Terance Mann in 2019 and Kentavious Caldwell-Pope in 2013), make him a versatile backcourt addition for almost any team. He will need to improve his decision-making and reduce turnovers to maximize his time as a primary ballhandler long-term. While some teams have speculated he might fall out of the top 10 depending on how the board shakes out, Jakucionis appears relatively stable in the 8-12 range at this juncture.


Portland Trail Blazers logo Pick 11: Portland Trail Blazers

Egor Demin, PG/SG, BYU | Freshman | TS%: 51.3

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-9¼
  • Weight: 199 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-9½
  • Wingspan: 6-10¼

Intel and fit: Demin had a positive week at the Chicago combine, measuring taller than expected at 6-9½ in shoes and then delivering one of the most impressive pro day performances witnessed in some time. This prompted even skeptical NBA evaluators to acknowledge his undeniable talent. Demin has shown significant physical improvement and is expected to continue developing his physique. He demonstrated impressive 3-point shooting with perfect mechanics and a lightning-quick release, offering considerable optimism despite hitting only 27% from three in his single season at BYU. Furthermore, NBA teams spoke highly of his interviews in Chicago. The Trail Blazers have multiple options with this pick, and adding a large guard with a strong understanding of the game who can fit into various roster compositions could be an intriguing long-term move.


Chicago Bulls logo Pick 12: Chicago Bulls

Derik Queen, C, Maryland | Freshman | TS%: 60.0

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-9¼
  • Weight: 247 lbs
  • Standing reach: 9-1½
  • Wingspan: 7-0½

Intel and fit: The Bulls reacquired this pick, previously top-10 protected, at the trade deadline in the Zach LaVine deal, guaranteeing they would add a prospect as they attempt to move out of the Eastern Conference middle tier. Chicago is positioned to draft the best available talent but has a greater need for frontcourt help, making Queen an interesting possibility if he slides to No. 12. Queen had an excellent season at Maryland and is being considered by teams as high as the mid-lottery, but his potential range appears somewhat wider. He measured a legitimate 6-10 in shoes but performed poorly in athletic testing at the combine and wasn`t a convincing shooter in drills. While not entirely surprising, these are two critical areas for his long-term development that teams will scrutinize as he begins the workout circuit. He possesses significant offensive talent, with a skillset that distinguishes him from other big men in this class – ultimately, his game film should carry more weight than the combine data. Whichever team drafts him will likely believe they can maximize his potential. His advocates around the league view him as an intelligent player with high upside.


Atlanta Hawks logo Pick 13: Atlanta Hawks (via Sacramento)

Joan Beringer, C, Cedevita Olimpija | Adriatic | TS%: 61.5

Intel and fit: Predicting the Hawks` direction with this pick is difficult until their front office structure is finalized following the departure of general manager Landry Fields last month. The Hawks have reportedly spoken with prominent agents and notable NBA executives. They might choose to hire a senior advisor to work alongside new GM Onsi Saleh. With the first of their two first-round picks, taking a chance on a high-upside prospect like Beringer would make sense, particularly as starting center Clint Capela approaches free agency. Beringer, 18, has been surprisingly effective for Cedevita this season, leading the Adriatic League in block percentage. His impressive physical tools, combined with his ability to defend on the perimeter, switch onto smaller players, and protect the rim, demonstrate significant potential, especially considering he has only been playing basketball for three years.


San Antonio Spurs logo Pick 14: San Antonio Spurs (via Atlanta)

Carter Bryant, SF/PF, Arizona | Freshman | TS%: 59.9

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-6½
  • Weight: 214 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-10
  • Wingspan: 6-11¾

Intel and fit: Even before the potential addition of Harper at No. 2, the Spurs recognized the need for maximum floor spacing around Victor Wembanyama and their guards. They should have an opportunity to address this need with their second first-round pick. Bryant fits well on paper if he is available at No. 14. Although his statistical production was modest in a supporting role at Arizona, NBA teams have consistently been intrigued by him, drawn to his promising shooting mechanics, passing feel, and a strong physical frame with measurements similar to Los Angeles Lakers forward Dorian Finney-Smith. Bryant has room to gain significant strength, which would enhance his defensive versatility. As a two-way contributor who doesn`t require high on-ball usage to add value, Bryant could easily integrate into the long-term plans of most teams, potentially putting him in contention for teams selecting higher than this spot.


Oklahoma City Thunder logo Pick 15: Oklahoma City Thunder (via Miami)

Noa Essengue, PF, Ratiopharm Ulm | Germany | TS%: 61.1

Intel and fit: With three picks in the top 44 selections but 14 players potentially under contract next season, it`s uncertain how much roster space Oklahoma City has for additional rookies. Options for the Thunder might include packaging picks to move up, trading non-rotation players, or deferring picks to future years by swapping this year`s selections for future first-rounders. Oklahoma City might not have immediate use for a player like Essengue, as this draft doesn`t appear to address many of their specific needs. If they use all their picks, the team will likely adopt a best-talent-available approach.


Orlando Magic logo Pick 16: Orlando Magic

Jase Richardson, PG/SG, Michigan State | Freshman | TS%: 63.2

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-0½
  • Weight: 178 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-2½
  • Wingspan: 6-6

Intel and fit: Following consecutive playoff appearances, Orlando`s front office seems focused on helping the team win its first playoff series since 2010, indicating a willingness to approach the offseason with a “win-now lens.” This might suggest they are open to trading one or both of their first-round picks (they also hold No. 25) if “proven offensive help” becomes available, a search likely to continue throughout the offseason. Should the Magic keep this pick, selecting a player like Richardson, who possesses an excellent feel for the game and strong defensive intensity (and shot 41% from three this season), makes sense. His ability to play off-ball alongside prolific scorers Franz Wagner and Paolo Banchero would also be a plus, as Richardson demonstrated a willingness to play a complementary role at Michigan State, showcasing strong character and winning attributes.


Minnesota Timberwolves logo Pick 17: Minnesota Timberwolves (via Detroit)

Danny Wolf, PF, Michigan | Junior | TS%: 56.6

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-10½
  • Weight: 251 lbs
  • Standing reach: 9-1
  • Wingspan: 7-2¼

Intel and fit: The Timberwolves are currently in a contention window and benefited from a surprising first-round pick in a valuable draft position thanks to the Detroit Pistons making the playoffs and conveying this lottery-protected selection (acquired from New York in the Karl-Anthony Towns trade) to Minnesota. This pick is likely a best-available situation for the team with the league`s lowest amount of future draft capital. The Wolves also hold the No. 31 pick, providing another useful asset. These two picks offer Minnesota a good opportunity to find value and add younger players around three-time All-Star Anthony Edwards. Wolf`s combination of perimeter skills, passing, and interior size (measuring 6-10½ barefoot, close to 7 feet in shoes with a 7-2¼ wingspan) makes him an intriguing prospect for teams looking for creative options. With Julius Randle and Naz Reid holding player options for next season, adding a younger forward like Wolf could be a consideration as the Timberwolves evaluate their roster options.


Washington Wizards logo Pick 18: Washington Wizards (via Memphis)

Liam McNeeley, SG/SF, UConn | Freshman | TS%: 53.6

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-6¾
  • Weight: 214 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-3½
  • Wingspan: 6-8½

Intel and fit: Expect the Wizards to continue making draft selections as they build upon the league`s fifth-youngest roster (average age 25.1). In this scenario, after drafting Johnson earlier, Washington would add a more versatile complementary wing in McNeeley, who aligns with their preference for positional size and basketball IQ. McNeeley measured and tested slightly better than anticipated at the combine (6-8 in shoes and 215 pounds) and appears to be positively trending. After an ankle injury hampered him for a portion of his freshman season at UConn, he will have opportunities during workouts to address questions about his athleticism and long-range shooting, reminding teams why he was viewed as a lottery prospect entering the season.


Brooklyn Nets logo Pick 19: Brooklyn Nets (via Milwaukee)

Thomas Sorber, C, Georgetown | Freshman | TS%: 58.7

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-9¼
  • Weight: 262 lbs
  • Standing reach: 9-1
  • Wingspan: 7-6

Intel and fit: With the second of their four first-round picks, the Nets have flexibility and will likely prioritize taking chances on talent while considering the importance of acquiring size in a league that is increasingly valuing traditional big men again. Sorber is not expected to participate in on-court activities during the pre-draft process as he recovers from foot surgery in February. Nevertheless, his strong basketball instincts, defensive versatility, length, physicality, and skill as a pick-and-roll finisher are attractive qualities for a 19-year-old prospect and should draw significant attention in this range of the draft. At the combine in Chicago, his impressive 7-6 wingspan was measured, allowing him to play significantly larger than his height (6-10½ in shoes).


Miami Heat logo Pick 20: Miami Heat (via Golden State)

Nolan Traore, PG, Saint-Quentin | France | TS%: 51.0

Intel and fit: The Heat acquired this pick in the Jimmy Butler trade and have a history of successful selections in the middle of the draft in recent years, adding Jaime Jaquez Jr. at No. 18 and Kel`el Ware at No. 15 in the past two drafts. Miami has utilized Tyler Herro at point guard frequently but would benefit from adding a true point guard to anchor the backcourt long-term, especially with a significant shot-creation void to fill following Butler`s departure. Traore would represent a high-upside swing if he falls to this position. Some scouts view him as a lottery-worthy talent, but an inconsistent season in France has somewhat dampened his draft stock. His size and speed, playmaking ability, and potential as a shooter offer clear upside if he can consistently put his game together. This far down in the draft, Traore is an appealing pick for a team like the Heat, known for their historical success in developing prospects.


Utah Jazz logo Pick 21: Utah Jazz (via Minnesota)

Asa Newell, PF/C, Georgia | Freshman | TS%: 62.0

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-9
  • Weight: 224 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-11½
  • Wingspan: 6-11¼

Intel and fit: The Jazz hold this second first-round pick from Minnesota via the Rudy Gobert trade. After selecting a point guard in Fears in the lottery, taking a chance on a talented young big man like Newell makes sense. Teams needing frontcourt help earlier in the draft also show interest in him. Newell`s combine measurements likely indicate he will play primarily power forward in the NBA. Nevertheless, his mobility, aggression, and intensity are significant assets that contributed to a highly productive and efficient freshman season. Newell made 26 three-pointers in 33 games and converted 75% of his free throws, positive indicators that scouts believe suggest he could develop into a more consistent outside shooter (currently 29% from three).


Atlanta Hawks logo Pick 22: Atlanta Hawks (via Los Angeles Lakers)

Will Riley, SG/SF, Illinois | Freshman | TS%: 53.8

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-8¼
  • Weight: 185 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-8
  • Wingspan: 6-8¾

Intel and fit: As previously mentioned, it`s challenging to pinpoint a clear direction for the Hawks until Atlanta finalizes its front office leadership hire. However, having already added big man Beringer, they can take a best-available approach with Riley, another young player with substantial long-term upside as his physique and skills mature. He will be discussed by teams selecting higher than this spot, possessing excellent size for a wing (measuring over 6-8 barefoot at the combine) and potential to add strength. His impressive offensive instincts and potential to become a high-level perimeter shooter check important boxes for teams willing to be patient with his development.


Indiana Pacers logo Pick 23: Indiana Pacers

Nique Clifford, SG, Colorado State | Super Senior | TS%: 60.9

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 6-5¼
  • Weight: 202 lbs
  • Standing reach: 8-6½
  • Wingspan: 6-8

Intel and fit: Currently engaged in a intense playoff battle, the Pacers may not be as focused on the draft as some other teams. Every team is actively seeking wing depth, and Clifford will likely receive attention higher than this pick due to his versatile, plug-and-play profile. He combines an excellent feel for the game with strong defensive adaptability while converting 38% of his three-point attempts over the past two seasons, making him a valuable potential addition.


Oklahoma City Thunder logo Pick 24: Oklahoma City Thunder (via LA Clippers)

Maxime Raynaud, PF/C, Stanford | Senior | TS%: 56.1

Combine Measurements:

  • Height without shoes: 7-0¼
  • Weight: 236 lbs
  • Standing reach: 9-2
  • Wingspan: 7-1¼

Intel and fit: It`s difficult to see Oklahoma City utilizing all three of its picks in the top 44 given their current roster situation. However, the Thunder have several months to finalize a plan, and there will be no shortage of interested teams if they decide to trade picks. Raynaud was one of the biggest winners at the combine, arguably the most impressive performer in the scrimmages, after measuring over 7 feet barefoot with a significant 9-2 standing reach. Raynaud`s ability to stretch the floor as a center is valuable in today`s NBA, but his ability to more than hold his own defensively in Chicago, both defending guards on the perimeter and altering shots at the rim, was equally important.


Orlando Magic logo Pick 25: Orlando Magic (via Denver)

Hugo Gonzalez, SG/SF, Real Madrid | EuroLeague | TS%: 50.9

Intel and fit: This is the Magic`s second first-round selection, acquired from Denver in 2021 in the Aaron Gordon trade. It`s unclear whether

By Marcus Prine

Marcus Prine is a rising star in sports journalism from Liverpool. Over 5 years, he has established himself as an expert in football and NBA coverage. His match reports are characterized by emotional depth and attention to detail.

Related Post